Post by Ying-ying Chen on May 14, 2015 2:48:24 GMT
According to the paper, Einstein penned “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” he notes that in order for a theory to be correct, it must have positive answers for these two questions. First of all, is the theory correct? Second, is the description given by the theory correct? These two questions are very similar to the position and momentum theory. In order for a theory to be correct, everything fact of it must be clear and true without guesses and assumptions.
In the end, it states that “Whereas Einstein didn't believe in a God that plays dice in the universe, Bohr not only accepted such indeterminacy but pointed out that it was part and parcel of how we understand the world of physics.” It is not only true but also possible for someone to know physics well. Even if you claim to know everything, you probably just know the tip of the iceberg of everything. The best scientist now even focuses on a small portion of science. Science is like the universe, then, people may know about how big it is today.
In the end, it states that “Whereas Einstein didn't believe in a God that plays dice in the universe, Bohr not only accepted such indeterminacy but pointed out that it was part and parcel of how we understand the world of physics.” It is not only true but also possible for someone to know physics well. Even if you claim to know everything, you probably just know the tip of the iceberg of everything. The best scientist now even focuses on a small portion of science. Science is like the universe, then, people may know about how big it is today.